mirror of
https://github.com/brmlab/brmdoor_libnfc.git
synced 2025-12-15 15:03:58 +01:00
Change method for scanning for card from poll, which is OK for USB-connected PN532, but causes 100% CPU usage with SPI-connected PN532
This commit is contained in:
parent
9b89a230c9
commit
91c0d72de6
3 changed files with 16 additions and 15 deletions
|
|
@ -104,19 +104,16 @@ std::string NFCDevice::scanUID() throw(NFCError)
|
|||
throw NFCError("NFC device not opened");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We release GIL because otherwise it would block other threads. Since this polling is de-facto sleep and
|
||||
// doesn't touch any variables, it works as a language without GIL would.
|
||||
Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS
|
||||
res = nfc_initiator_poll_target(_nfcDevice, _modulations, _modulationsLen, pollNr, pollPeriod, &nt);
|
||||
Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS
|
||||
/* nfc_initiator_poll_target works fine for USB-connected PN532 (sleeps until card is available or timeout),
|
||||
* but causes 100% CPU usage on SPI-connected PN532
|
||||
*/
|
||||
//res = nfc_initiator_poll_target(_nfcDevice, _modulations, _modulationsLen, pollNr, pollPeriod, &nt);
|
||||
res = nfc_initiator_list_passive_targets(_nfcDevice, _modulations[0], &nt, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (res < 0) {
|
||||
throw NFCError("NFC polling error");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// we are not interested in non-ISO-14443A cards
|
||||
if (nt.nm.nmt != NMT_ISO14443A) {
|
||||
return string();
|
||||
throw NFCError("NFC list passive targets error");
|
||||
} else if (res == 0) {
|
||||
throw NFCError("No card in reader's field");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const nfc_iso14443a_info& nai = nt.nti.nai;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue